#linuxcnc | Logs for 2019-09-19

Back
[20:17:57] -!- logs has joined #linuxcnc
[20:19:37] <Lcvette> Tom_L: yeah i read that last night, but I didn't understand it's relevance
[20:20:14] <Tom_L> http://linuxcnc.org
[20:20:17] <Tom_L> read 5.2
[20:20:57] <Tom_L> then go read that pendant.hal file i posted yesterday
[20:21:21] <Tom_L> some homework...
[20:22:22] -!- flyback has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[20:23:00] -!- Akex_ has joined #linuxcnc
[20:26:53] -!- flyback has joined #linuxcnc
[20:38:22] -!- djdelorie has joined #linuxcnc
[20:45:25] -!- flyback has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[20:52:58] -!- CaptHindsight has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[21:10:09] -!- flyback has joined #linuxcnc
[21:16:43] -!- Tom_itx has joined #linuxcnc
[21:28:11] -!- gloops has joined #linuxcnc
[21:37:54] -!- Tom_itx has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[21:40:23] -!- gloops has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
[21:52:11] -!- BitEvil has joined #linuxcnc
[21:52:12] SpeedEvil is now known as Guest31591
[21:52:24] -!- Guest31591 has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
[22:01:47] -!- Tom_itx has joined #linuxcnc
[22:06:13] <Tom_L> pcw_home around?
[22:15:14] <Tom_L> net x-jog-select joint.0.jog-enable <= hm2_7i92.0.7i77.0.0.input-20.in_not
[22:15:19] <Tom_L> generates an error
[22:15:29] <Tom_L> is there another syntax to invert the input pin?
[22:16:42] <skunkworks> what is the error?
[22:17:05] <Tom_L> https://matrix.org
[22:17:17] <Tom_L> without the .in_not it's ok
[22:18:30] <Tom_L> i'm not familiar with that board so i'm not sure if that pin is gpio but it should be
[22:34:23] -!- Tom_itx has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[22:34:39] <Lcvette> should we switch to over here?
[22:34:45] <Lcvette> Tom_L
[22:34:46] <Lcvette> ?
[22:35:44] <Tom_L> i don't care
[22:35:51] <Lcvette> ok
[22:35:58] <Lcvette> i9 guess we are gonna wait for peter
[22:36:24] <Lcvette> and i will throw it on the foprum and see if anyone has any ideas that may be playing in 2.9 as well
[22:37:08] <Tom_L> you say the enable led changes state but the TRUE FALSE does not?
[22:37:31] <Tom_L> that could be a screen refresh thing too
[22:37:47] <Lcvette> correct
[22:37:56] <Lcvette> when enabled the led goes from red to yello
[22:38:03] <Lcvette> but the false sdtatement remain false
[22:38:47] <Tom_L> ok, here's my thoughts on that
[22:39:06] <Tom_L> even if the one axis is changing state the other two are not
[22:39:27] <Tom_L> so at least one and possibly 2 axis couuld or should be moving at once
[22:39:40] <Tom_L> because they are not all enabled at the same time
[22:39:56] <Tom_L> so reversing the logic may do nothing here
[22:40:00] <Lcvette> sec
[22:40:05] <Tom_L> does that make sense?
[22:40:18] <Tom_L> you have 3 axis that _can_ move
[22:40:37] <Tom_L> only one should but if the logic is reversed, the other 2 would move
[22:41:53] <Tom_L> i'm running out of ideas
[22:43:33] * Lcvette uploaded an image: Screenshot_2019-09-19_22-42-38.png (47KB) < https://matrix.org >
[22:43:39] * Lcvette uploaded an image: Screenshot_2019-09-19_22-42-53.png (47KB) < https://matrix.org >
[22:43:48] * Lcvette uploaded an image: Screenshot_2019-09-19_22-43-03.png (47KB) < https://matrix.org >
[22:44:02] <Lcvette> Tom_L: it switches bvetween the 3 axis with the selector
[22:44:13] <Lcvette> see above
[22:45:10] <Tom_L> you get what i'm saying about the movement?
[22:45:13] <Lcvette> or i guess i should say joints not axis's
[22:45:34] <Tom_L> so the .in_not is likely not the solution
[22:45:40] <Lcvette> you mean on the inverse?
[22:45:48] <Tom_L> yes
[22:46:05] <Lcvette> no i was thinking the same thing earlier
[22:46:08] <Tom_L> if the logic needed to be reversed, the two red dot axis would move
[22:46:12] <Lcvette> yup im with ya
[22:46:26] <Tom_L> and the yellow would be idle
[22:46:33] <Lcvette> yup
[22:46:49] <Lcvette> it is showing the selector working in the joint pins properly
[22:46:54] <Lcvette> its perplexing
[22:47:15] <Lcvette> someone is going to say ph yeah do yada yada yada line and it will work im sure
[22:47:16] <Tom_L> borderline a bug
[22:47:43] <Lcvette> im glad youn are seeing it with me cause if i werte alone i would be losing my mind
[22:47:47] <Tom_L> i wish you could A: try axis gui and or B: try 2.7
[22:48:32] <Lcvette> not sure if i can just swwap axis in for qtpyvcp in the in?
[22:48:54] <Tom_L> pretty sure
[22:49:08] <Lcvette> hang on let me give it a whirl
[22:49:18] <Lcvette> although it didn't work in gmoccapy either so im not hopeful
[22:49:58] <Tom_L> display = axis
[22:50:21] <Lcvette> big long debug error message
[22:51:03] <Tom_L> ok forget that for now
[22:51:05] <Lcvette> lots of stuff refering to my toolchange stuf
[22:51:14] <Lcvette> rather not mess with that
[22:51:15] <Lcvette> lol
[22:52:56] <Lcvette> pcw_home where are you big chief?
[22:52:58] <Lcvette> lol
[22:53:04] <Lcvette> neeeds your expertise please!
[22:53:16] <Tom_L> ok i'm out
[22:53:44] <Lcvette> Tom_L: me too, thanks again for your help tom_l!
[22:53:45] <Lcvette> you da man!
[23:14:32] -!- jym has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
[23:20:28] -!- CaptHindsight has joined #linuxcnc
[23:20:53] <CaptHindsight> Expired today https://patents.google.com
[23:26:49] <Rab> That's an interesting one.
[23:36:00] <CaptHindsight> using high powered projectors vs a laser makes this the fastest and most cost effective sand mold printing process
[23:54:04] -!- justanotheruser has joined #linuxcnc